Orders to CEO/President Donald J. Trump

You ask what We THE People want, we are telling you.
Immediately deliver Ambassador Leo Wanta's money to him
Immediately end inland piracy and prosecution of victimless crimes
Immediately end direct apportioned tax against the people
Enforce the original 13th Amendment

Signed: We THE People 

Wednesday, March 29, 2017

To Kevin --- RE: Mission Priorities, Militias, and Continental Marshals



By Anna Von Reitz
 
Kevin-- you and your friends are correct that you SHOULD be working first on getting your counties organized. That is precisely the mission I asked Bruce Doucette to undertake almost a year ago. And I gave him contact with the oldest functioning Post-Civil War Jural Assembly to help develop a solid program for all the other counties to follow. 

That is what I focused on as the most urgent need. Instead of getting in contact with the already up and functioning and correctly organized Jural Assembly in Michigan, he and Roger Dowdell and others spent months blithering around trying to re-create the wheel. 

When Bruce discussed the Continental Marshals program with me, I assumed that he knew what he was talking about and that he was NOT talking about the state militias which are a separate force and work in a separate jurisdiction. 

I agree with you that the priority SHOULD be to organize the state militias and to do that in tandem with organizing the Jural Assemblies. For your information every American above the age of 21 is expected to either join their state militia and carry a gun or work in a support position.  

It therefore makes sense that you build the militia at the same time you build the jural assemblies -- but since they didn't do what I asked them to do with the jural assemblies, diddly squat got done organizing the militias, too. 

By all means, run don't walk -- get your local county jural assembly and your local militia set up and functioning FIRST. 

The reason that I thought we were organizing Continental Marshals TOO was that most of the crimes that are causing so much suffering-- identity theft, foreclosures, bank fraud, unlawful conversion of assets, kidnapping and inland piracy are all crimes that occur in international jurisdiction. 

It is for lack of "Federal" aka "Continental Marshals" that the vermin are having a field day, so that is why I thought the push was on the form the Marshals Service. 

You guys must be thicker than bricks when it comes to doing your own research.  If you are looking for "Federal Postal District Courts" why don't you bother to put those words into your search box and visit a few browsers? 

These courts not only exist, I have served on them in the past. 

Thanks to Russell Gould we have never completely lost our Federal Postal District Courts. And thanks to my husband and me the rats have not been able to successfully claim that our land jurisdiction states no longer exist. 

I have been working very hard in international jurisdiction for months to reclaim our assets from the IMF and the UNITED STATES bankruptcy.  I have been working equally hard to secure funding for all 50 states and 3100 counties and everything we need to be fully operational again. 

I can't do it all. 

So here is what I suggest-- you guys who joined the Marshals program thinking it was the state militias--- just leave and turn your attention to building your county jural assemblies and your local militias and after that, work on building your state assemblies and state militias. 

You should all have plenty to do and thanks to me and the 50 States Claim you should shortly have what you need to do the work in paid positions with offices and support. 

What I further suggest is that you leave the Marshals program alone and stop blaming Marshal Haywood. I have investigated and she did absolutely nothing wrong.  

The people who are now blaming her are the very same ones who failed in the mission I gave them-- organizing the counties and militias. That suggests to me that (1) they are unable or unwilling to follow simple instructions and do the grunt work or (2) it was their intent to mislead and undermine the effort from the start. 

Either way, Bella Haywood has done her actual job and done it well and the Continental Marshals program will continue under her guidance and under the authority of the Federal Postal District Courts.  Those who want to work in international jurisdiction and think they have the experience to qualify are welcome to apply and those who have been successfully vetted into the program are welcome to stay or go as they please. 

We will not gild any lilies or bow to what amounts to a witch hunt and ill-informed public opinion. 

Any idea that you have that I am ill-informed or "just making things up" needs to be tempered with the certain knowledge that I have been in these trenches since you were a child and if I was wrong about any it, talking through my hat about ANY of it, I would have been arrested like so many others have been and would be cooling my jets in a federal jail like Thomas Deegan and so many others. 

The proof is in the pudding. 

And available on the internet if you bother to read the Rogue Sabre Special Ops Report and bother to plug the words "Federal Postal District Court" into your browser

That really IS a high rise: Sci-fi plan to hang a wandering skyscraper from asteroid orbiting Earth is unveiled

  • Radical skyscraper design from a New York City firm will be built from the sky down, instead of the ground up
  • Analemma Tower is set to be suspended from an orbiting asteroid 31,068 miles (50,000 km) above the Earth
  • Tower will move in a figure eight pattern between the northern and southern hemispheres each day
  • Solar panels will generate power and water will be collected from cloud condensation and rain water
  • Building will be broken up into sections, such as business, worship, dining, shopping and entertainment

A New York architecture firm has unveiled designs for a skyscraper that is out of this world.

Deemed the ‘world’s tallest building ever’, Analemma Tower will be suspended from an orbiting asteroid 31,068 miles (50,000 km) above the Earth– and the only way to leave is by parachute.

The orbital path would swing the tower in a figure eight pattern between the northern and southern hemispheres each day, taking residents on a tour through different parts of the world - all in just a 24 hour orbital cycle.

 The orbital path would swing the tower in a figure eight pattern between the northern and southern hemispheres each day, taking residents on a tour through different parts of the work, including New York City (pictured) - all in just a 24 hour orbital cycle.

The orbital path would swing the tower in a figure eight pattern between the northern and southern hemispheres each day, taking residents on a tour through different parts of the work, including New York City (pictured) - all in just a 24 hour orbital cycle.

The radical design was created by Clouds Architecture Office, which is also the mastermind behind proposals for a Mars house and a cloud city.

The firm's latest design, Analemma Tower, will 'overturn the established skyscraper typology', as it builds from the sky down, instead of the ground up.

'Through the course of history humanity has been able to affect the environment on increasing scales,' explained the firm.

Analemma Tower will be suspended from an orbiting asteroid and hang down to the Earth.

It will travel in a figure eight pattern through the northern and southern hemispheres and pass over major cities such as Panama City, Havana, Atlanta and New York City.

The proposal calls for Analemma to first be constructed over Dubai, which has proven to be a specialist in tall building construction at one fifth the cost of New York City construction.

The design will use a system called the Universal Orbital Support System (UOSS), which attaches a high strength cable to an asteroid that is lowered to Earth and attached to the tower
Since this new tower typology is suspended in the air, it can be constructed anywhere in the world and transported to its final location

The design will use a system called the Universal Orbital Support System (UOSS), which attaches a high strength cable to an asteroid that is lowered to Earth and attached to the tower. Since this new tower typology is suspended in the air, it can be constructed anywhere in the world and transported to its final location

 The massive skyscraper will be setup in sections and each with a designated purpose.

Business will be conducted at the lower end of the towers and sleeping quarters will be positioned two-thirds of the way up the building.

Residents will also have access to a gardening area, a place for worship and in the bottom level will be sections for dining, shopping and entertainment.
The architects plan to take full advantage of the skyscraper's location and will place solar panels at the upper most levels to generate power from the sun.
And residents will enjoy fresh water from condensation of clouds and rainwater, which will be collected and purified.

The proposed orbit is calibrated so the slowest part of the towers trajectory also occurs over New York City (pictured)
The proposed orbit is calibrated so the slowest part of the towers trajectory also occurs over New York City (pictured)
A New York architecture firm has unveiled designs for a skyscraper that is out of this world. Deemed the ‘world’s tallest building ever’, Analemma Tower is shown suspended from an orbiting asteroid – and the only way to leave is by parachute 

'Today our activity is being registered on a global scale. So why not apply design thinking on a planetary scale?'

'Analemma Tower is an example of a mixed use building that incorporates planetary design strategies, yielding the world’s tallest building ever.'

It seems that Cloud Architecture Office is not just developing a massive skyscraper, but is also designing a floating city. It will be setup into sections, each with a designated purpose

It seems that Cloud Architecture Office is not just developing a massive skyscraper, but is also designing a floating city. It will be setup into sections, each with a designated purpose

The design will use a system called the Universal Orbital Support System (UOSS), which attaches a high strength cable to an asteroid that is lowered to Earth and then attached to the tower.

‘Since this new tower typology is suspended in the air, it can be constructed anywhere in the world and transported to its final location,’ Clouds Architecture Office shared on its website.

‘The proposal calls for Analemma to be constructed over Dubai, which has proven to be a specialist in tall building construction at one fifth the cost of New York City construction.’

And although some may question the firm’s ability to capture an asteroid for the project, Clouds Architecture Office believes its idea will soon no longer be just a concept from science fiction films.

‘In 2015 the European Space Agency sparked a new round of investment in asteroid mining concerns by proving with its Rosetta mission that it's possible to rendezvous and land on a spinning comet,’ shared the firm.

‘NASA has scheduled an asteroid retrieval mission for 2021 which aims to prove the feasibility of capturing and relocating an asteroid.’

The tower would travel on a figure eight path over certain major cities in the northern and southern hemispheres - this includes New York City, Havana, Atlanta and Panama City.

And the amount of daylight increases by 40 minutes at the top of the tower due to the curvature of the Earth.

‘Analemma can be placed in an eccentric geosynchronous orbit which would allow it to travel between the northern and southern hemispheres on a daily loop,’ Clouds Architecture Office explained.

‘The ground trace for this pendulum tower would be a figure eight, where the tower would move at its slowest speed at the top and bottom of the figure eight allowing the possibility for the towers occupants to interface with the planet’s surface at these points.’

‘The proposed orbit is calibrated so the slowest part of the towers trajectory occurs over New York City.’

According to the drawings, it seems that Cloud Architecture Office is not just developing a massive skyscraper, but is also designing a floating city.
The large tower will be setup in sections, each with a designated function for the residents to feel more at home.

Business will be conducted at the lower end of the towers and sleeping quarters will be positioned two-thirds of the way up the building.

Residents will also have access to a gardening area, a place for worship and in the bottom level will be a place to dine shop and enjoy entertainment.

The architects plan to take full advantage of the skyscraper's location and will place solar panels at the upper most levels to generate power from the sun.
Residents will also have access to fresh water from condensation of clouds and rainwater, which will be collected and purified.

Because the tower will be traveling on a looping path, the views will change throughout the day depending on the height of the tower.

The architect firm plans to design shape-shifting windows that change size and height in order to deal with pressure and temperature differentials.

The team discovered that there is most likely a height that people could not tolerate living due to the extreme conditions. ‘For example, while there may be a benefit to having 45 extra minutes of daylight at an elevation of 32,000 meters, the near vacuum and -40C temperature would prevent people from going outside without a protective suit
The team discovered that there is most likely a height that people could not tolerate living due to the extreme conditions. ‘For example, while there may be a benefit to having 45 extra minutes of daylight at an elevation of 32,000 meters, the near vacuum and -40C temperature would prevent people from going outside without a protective suit
The architects have plans to design shape shifting windows that change their size in height in order to deal with the pressure and temperature differentials

The architects have plans to design shape shifting windows that change their size in height in order to deal with the pressure and temperature differentials
However, while researching atmospheric conditions for the project, the team discovered that there is most likely a height that people could not tolerate due to the extreme conditions.

‘For example, while there may be a benefit to having 45 extra minutes of daylight at an elevation of 32,000 meters, the near vacuum and -40C temperature would prevent people from going outside without a protective suit,’ shared Clouds Architecture Office.

‘Then again, astronauts have continually occupied the space station for decades, so perhaps it’s not so bad?’ 
The proposal calls for Analemma to be constructed over Dubai, which has proven to be a specialist in tall building construction at one fifth the cost of New York City construction. However, once near completion, the team will transport the tower to New York City where it will attach it to the orbiting asteroid 
The proposal calls for Analemma to be constructed over Dubai, which has proven to be a specialist in tall building construction at one fifth the cost of New York City construction. However, once near completion, the team will transport the tower to New York City where it will attach it to the orbiting asteroid 
The tower would travel on a figure-8 path over certain major cities in the northern and southern hemispheres - such as New York City, Havana, Atlanta and Panama City. And the amount of daylight increases by 40 minutes at the top of the tower due to the curvature of the earth
The tower would travel on a figure-8 path over certain major cities in the northern and southern hemispheres - such as New York City, Havana, Atlanta and Panama City. And the amount of daylight increases by 40 minutes at the top of the tower due to the curvature of the earth

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

BREAKING!!! IT’S HAPPENING! WHAT THIS OBAMA AIDE SQUEALED ON LIVE TV WIL...



Obama's MANSION: a prank gets out of hand

BREAKING: Obama’s DC Mansion Attacked And On Fire – Here’s What We Know 


Former President Barack Obama’s Washington DC mansion was attacked early this afternoon by what investigators are calling an improvised explosive device. 

While there seems to have been minimal damage to the brick fortress the taxpayers are keeping him in these days, the smoke can still be seen over the Tracey Place neighborhood.
Secret Service and Homeland Security were on scene quickly and cordoned off a 2-mile radius around the house, confiscating recording devices from anyone they could. 

A bystander who got out before the Gestapo tactics began released two pictures to the Associated Press, which they printed and then removed after being threatened. 

We’re not going to be bullied into removing ours.  You can see clearly that the roof was affected. 

There are no reports of injuries, but the FBI does have 2 suspects in custody. They were going to be charged with terrorist acts until it was discovered that they were young Americans who probably just let a prank get out of hand and tossed a pipe bomb at the house of an ex-president. They fall more under the 'lone wolf' category than that of terrorists.  The two are currently awaiting release on $500 bail.
 
http://thelastlineofdefense.org/breaking-obamas-dc-mansion-attacked-and-on-fire-heres-what-we-know/ 

ANY ONE WANT TO BET THAT THE 'BLAME' WILL BE PLACED ON THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION??!!!

Obamacare: Congressman files one sentence bill to repeal



 CONGRESSMAN FILES ONE SENTENCE BILL
TO REPEAL 'OBAMACARE'


Rep Mo Brooks, a Republican from the 5th Congressional District in Alabama, has filed a bill simply titled the “Obamacare Repeal Act,” and it contains just one sentence.

The bill simply reads:
“Effective as of December 31, 2017, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148) is repealed, and the provisions of law amended or repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such Act had not been enacted.”
No really. That’s it. You can see for yourself below.
View at web address below:
 


The Deep State War on Trump

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBTMKLmdpho&feature=youtu.be

Dr. Phil: Elite Pedophilia Includes Child “Hunts” and Children Born into Pedophile Slavery… Full Video & Links to Pedophilia @ Phi Beta Iota

https://youtu.be/e5zZHf2X650
http://phibetaiota.net/2017/03/dr-phil-elite-pedophilia-includes-child-hunts-and-children-born-into-pedophile-slavery/

A "Dirty War" Is Approaching


A "Dirty War" Is Approaching
Prophetic Word

There are 4 steps to a nuclear war



!! Friends! Read once again added info!. EMERGENCY!! Three ARMIES have JUST Formed Against Trump Supporters

Friends,
if you watch a video below, you will see that Cabal is hiring people who commit cyber attacks and who try to destroy reputations  of the patriotic mass media. Only a few minutes ago, a Mossado-crack at Unit 89, 900  Henderson Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA vandalized my email to you (check previous email). The photo of this Mossado-crack is attached.

Friends, I am a simple and kind woman. However, I was announced as a Serous Threat for National Security of the Cabal.  Look at my photo at each of my emails.  Do I look aggressive or scary? I am not kidding; one of the psychopaths, working for Cabal,  was screaming two months ago, stating that I am a Serous Threat for their National Security.

My Dear Friends, I already investigated whose national security Deep State is protecting...  This nationality has three branches....  They already many years ago destroyed their planet.

Mars was a Sputnik-Luna of this planet long time ago... They created many wars, after which blew up their planet, and they came to our planet, Mother Earth, which they try now to destroy if mass arrests of them would take place.  They want to blow up our planet with Toplet Bombs that this satanic scum inserted inside of the plasma of our planet... Their God's name is Satanico, and they came to our planet with their Satanico...  Light forces took their Satanico from our planet a few years ago and brought Satan to Central Sun.

Now, they are with Lucifer... This nation has three psychopathic branches.  I will tell you more about the three branches of this nation for which I was announced as a serious threat.  

Ms. Nina Sidorova
a Threat for National Security of Cabal 





https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/2017/03/28/emergency-three-armies-have-just-formed-against-trump-supporters/

EMERGENCY!! Three ARMIES have JUST Formed Against Trump Supporters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-pjfCsqFVU

Look at 3:20 Thieves, who are money grubbing our country, offered money, $15000, which they stole from our budget to pay to any of the 'cracks' who agreed to form a team against President Trump

UN Chief Threatens Action if Trump Keeps Deporting Illegal Aliens, Refugees




Fellow Conservative,

The United Nations is stunned. For eight years, the Obama administration gave them a blank check and worked with them to enact liberal agenda items. That gravy train is over.

When President Trump released his budget, he proposed slashing the UN’s budget by up to 50%. Did the UN back off and start changing its ways? No.
Despite all the atrocities taking place around the world, the UN human rights chief has decided to go after the Trump administration. Why? Because Trump is deporting illegal aliens and stopping Middle Eastern refugees from entering the United States.

The UN’s message? Let the refugees and illegal aliens stay… or else!
Force Congress to pull the plug! Send your FaxBlast and demand that they defund the United Nations over this!

Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein, a Jordanian Prince and now the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, threatened the Trump administration with repercussions if the President did not stop “discriminating” against “Mexicans and Muslims.” He even threatened to take the United States to International court for violating the “right” of people to live in the United States.

He declared that President Trump’s policies are “in breach of international law, if undertaken without due process guarantees, including individual assessment.” He also declared that there is no alternative but to give the Palestinians their own state and the US could be punished for interfering…
Yes, he is that backwards.

The United Nations is also taunting the United States and declaring there is nothing Trump can do to stop the UN Climate Change Treaty, Arms Treaty, or other politicized treaties signed by Obama without Congressional approval.
They think that they can threaten the Trump administration while continuing to cash checks from the United States Treasury.

If the UN takes the United States to court over Trump’s deportation policies or refugee ban (which a Virginia judge just upheld), they will finance their lawsuit with YOUR tax dollars.

No more…

Senator Ted Cruz has a bill that is just gathering dust in the Senate. It would completely defund the United Nations. He recently pleaded with Conservatives around the country to hold Congress accountable for the promises it made. One of those is to completely defund the United Nations.

Barack Obama spent eight years conspiring with the United Nations to implement their globalist agenda. To accomplish this, he bypassed Congress and the US Constitution’s treaty clause.

Days before leaving office, Obama raided the treasury and gave away an additional half billion dollars of your money to help the UN fund its liberal pet projects.

And now the UN is using this money to undermine the Trump administration.
No more United Nations! Send your FaxBlast to Congress and help Ted Cruz force a vote on his bill to defund the UN!
Finish this,
Joe Otto
Conservative Daily

 https://conservative-daily.com/2017/03/26/un-chief-threatens-action-trump-keeps-deporting-illegal-aliens-refugees/

Federal Courthouse in Las Vegas BANS jurors from reading the U.S. Constitution

Image: Federal Courthouse in Las Vegas BANS jurors from reading the U.S. Constitution
(Natural News) The Bundy Ranch trials are underway, having begun in February of this year. There have already been reports that federal court Judge Gloria Navarro, who is presiding over the case, has dealt several blows to the defense teams throughout the trial. She has allegedly given the prosecution favorable treatment regarding time expansion, granting them over five weeks to present their case. She has, however, refused to do the same for the defense, allowing the six defendants only one week to present their case.

For the upcoming trial of Cliven Bundy, owner of the ranch at the center of the case, Navarro has also refused to allow nationally renowned lawyer Larry Klayman to defend Bundy, whose trial is set to begin in May. Klayman, who is the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, is known for being steadfast in his litigation in support of mostly conservative-leaning and libertarian-leaning issues. , Navarro said she would not allow Klayman into the high-profile criminal case until he can give her proof that “ethical disciplinary proceedings” against him in Washington, D.C., have been resolved in his favor.

Judge Navarro has now taken her detest for the defense even further and imposed a rule stating that no copies of the U.S. Constitution were allowed in this Federal Courtroom.
According to Redoubt News:
  • Witnesses have told me that the U.S. Marshals have decided that they will no longer allow copies of the U.S. Constitution to be brought into the courthouse. They have even gone so far as to remove them from ladies’ purses to be discarded into the trash. It is not limited to just those that are showing from shirt pockets.
  • Defendant Eric Parker, who has consistently placed a copy of the Constitution in his pocket during these proceedings, was forced to remove it and told to keep it flat at the defendant’s table so the jury could not see it.
  • The jury cannot be allowed to even look at the Constitution!
Eric Parker, known during the standoff as “The Man on the Bridge” or “The Bundy Ranch Sniper,” has been adamant that this case will set a precedent regarding government overreach and constitutional rights. During an interview with Early Rising, the married father of two said, “I believe in the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. I believe that those are natural rights, God-given; that the Constitution only reaffirms them. I believe that without defending them, they don’t truly exist.” Having a copy of The Constitution in his pocket during trial no doubt reinforces the virtues of liberty, limited government, and the Constitutionally protected rights that he believes in. Now that symbol is being taken away. (RELATED: Get more news like this at .)

The Bundy Ranch Standoff, or the “Battle of Bunker Hill,” was a six-day standoff between armed ranchers and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management officials in April 2014. Bundy, a cattle rancher, had refused to pay federal fees after he allowed his cows to graze on so-called public lands. He vehemently disagrees with federal authorities, arguing that the property is where his ancestors first settled in the 1880’s. In 1998,  took Bundy to federal court, which ruled in favor of the BLM, and awarded them $1.2 million. Bundy has refused to pay the fees, and after years of failed negotiations, the BLM showed up to the ranch in an attempt to gather his cattle as payment for the outstanding fees. Bundy, with the help of several other supporters, including his sons, protested the takeover, which the prosecution has presented at trial to be an armed assault against the officers. During the event, the only person injured was one of Bundy’s sons, who was tasered by one of the officers.

A total of 19 people were arrested and jailed in connection with the standoff. Two pleaded guilty and accepted punishment for lesser charges while the remaining others, including Bundy and his sons, pleaded not guilty to conspiracy, assault on a federal officer, obstruction of justice, and several other charges. If convicted of all charges, each defendant could face up to 101 years in prison. Follow more news about outrageous government tyranny at Tyranny.news.

Sources:
Guns.com
Eaglerising.com
Redoubtnews.com
Reviewjournal.com

Look at Ben Garrisons'' New Picture! Funny!


Wet T-Shirt contest!


Wet T-Shirt contest!


Only a daddy could tolerate this!
hahahahahaha.............


Chuck Schumer’s screaming fit MELTDOWN

US Troops Awakening to the DECEPTION


US TROOPS AWAKENING 
TO THE DECEPTION
"Terrorism"
A FALSE CREATED WAR
 US Troops are WAKING UP to the DECEPTION
Who is creating the wars and who they are serving
They are MAD AS HELL
Support and encourage these troops
PRAY FOR THEM
 A MUST SEE and HEAR!



SCOTTISH DIPLOMACY

Lest you think I don't have an opinion about this subject, I didn't think there was anything wrong with his response.  



Subject: SCOTTISH DIPLOMACY
 
One thing about blokes from Scotland is that their hearts and humor are always in the right place! 
 
Jimmy MacDonald, a City Counselor from Glasgow, was asked on a local live radio talk show, just what he thought about the allegations of torture of suspected terrorists.
 
His reply prompted his ejection from the studio, but to thunderous applause from the audience.
 
HIS STATEMENT:  'If hooking up one rag-head terrorist's testicles to a car battery gets the truth out of the lying little camel shagger to save just one Scottish soldier’s life, then I have only three things to say; Red is positive, Black is negative and make sure his nuts are wet."

Monday, March 27, 2017

ALERT! Dems writing Bill to go after Trump


ALERT!  IT'S  HAPPENING.  DEMOCRATS  WRITING  BILL  SPECIFICALLY  TO  GO  AFTER  PRESIDENT TRUMP  






By   


Well, at least you have to give Democrats in Congress credit for creativity when it comes to naming proposed laws.

 Democrat senators troll Trump
 with Mar-a-Lago Act


Published on Mar 25, 2017
Democrats have introduced the creatively acronymized MAR-A-LAGO Act requiring the White House to publish the visitor log for Mar-a-Lago, President Donald Trump’s resort where he has spent nearly a quarter of his time in office.


Enter the MAR-A-LAGO Act – which stands for the “Making Access Records Available to Lead American Government Openness Act.”

From Allen B. West
If you remember, Barack Obama promised that his administration would be the most transparent in history — and ended up objectively being the least transparent.
During his last year in office, Obama spent over $36 million in legal costs to defend his administration against lawsuits related to his refusal to honor a number of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.
The Associated Press noted the Obama administration “set records for outright denial of access to files, refusing to quickly consider requests described as especially newsworthy, and forcing people to pay for records who had asked the government to waive search and copy fees.”
None of that bothered Congressional Democrats then — but they’re back with the Mar-A-Lago Act, concerned about President Donald Trump’s transparency.
According to CNBC:
The legislation would require the publication of White House visitor logs, something that was done regularly by the Obama administration but has since ended since President Trump took office. It would also mandate the release of visitor logs at other locations where the president conducts business — for example, Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s Florida resort that he has recently called the Southern White House.
Introduced by Sens. Tom Udall of New Mexico, Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island and Tom Carper of Delaware and Rep. Mike Quigley of Illinois, it comes after the president spent five weekends in Mar-a-Lago since his inauguration.
“By refusing to release the White House visitor logs, President Trump is only validating the rampant concerns about who may be pulling the levers in his administration,” Udall said in a statement. “The president should end his administration’s disturbing pattern of stonewalling information and immediately reinstate the previous administration’s policy of publishing White House visitor logs. And given President Trump’s unprecedented decision to conduct official business at his private business properties, the Trump administration has an obligation to make public the visitor lists at places like Mar-a-Lago and Trump Tower.”
To be honest, it would be to Trump’s benefit to release those visitor logs. They’re unlikely to reveal anything — and will undoubtedly lead to another Rachel Maddow segment we can all laugh at.
Of course, that bill would have to make it through both Republican dominated houses of Congress, and be signed by Trump himself. The goal of proposing this bill isn’t to actually get it passed, it’s to have Republicans shoot it down so that Congressional Democrats can speculate they have something to hide.
http://eheadlines.com/alert-its-happening-democrats-writing-bill-specifically-to-go-after-trump-video/

EMERGENCY!! Three ARMIES have JUST Formed Against Supporters


EMERGENCY!
PRAY FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP!

EMERGENCY: $15,000 To OUST President Trump! 
Three ARMIES have JUST Formed Against Supporters



WANTA - " DEAD MAN WALKING " - EMBASSY RECORDING - GOVERNOR/SENATOR


AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.
Office of the Chairman / Chief Executive Officer
Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta
S.D.R. Diplomatic Passport No. 04362, 12535
4001 North 9th Street, Suite No. 227
Arlington, Virginia, USA  22203-1954
Commonwealth of Virginia
_________________________________________________

White House INTEL Files Received and Acknowledged -








Anyone who claim to be a Continental Marshal better read this before you end up imprisoned or dead!

A Marshal is the highest ranking officer of military police! If you did not become a MP in the military service and have rank promoted to Marshal, then you are in violation of Lieber code and punishable in a military court. Please read the information at this link. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/lieber.asp#sec1

All American DeFacto courts are military courts. This is why any military rank above Sargent (if I remember right) can arrest a judge.

Abraham Lincoln declared General Order 100 in 1863 that put America under Lieber Code Military Jurisdiction and Marshal Law and Lincoln was Assassinated before he could end General order 100 revoking Lieber Code laws applying to the 50 nation=states. The title "Marshal" is a military office! Stop using "Continental Marshals" title immediately before you are arrested for impersonating a military law enforcement officer!

You people trying to claim particular duties that belong to the state's militias by declaring yourselves as Continental Marshals are putting yourselves in serious danger!


You may look up the definitions for "marshal" and you will find what I found and read. You will find some entries under civilian areas and also those areas are under Lieber Code. It is still military. 

 
 F. Lieber
 
A. Lincoln

Laws and Treaties Protecting Cultural Property

The Lieber Code of 1863

 

 

Early in the 19th century, Chief Justice Marshall noted that sovereign nations had the right to confiscate property of an enemy during armed conflict, but the Lieber Code of 1863, formally known as General Order No. 100, reversed that notion by incorporating the principle that monuments, places of worship and works of art must be spared from destruction in times of war. The code, commissioned by President Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War, was published as a pamphlet that could be carried by Union soldiers. Written by Professor Francis Lieber of Columbia College (now Columbia University), it provided that “classical works of art, libraries, scientific collections, or precious instruments . . . must be secured against all avoidable injury” (Article 35).

The Lieber Code also identified military necessity for the first time as a general legal principle whose purpose was to limit violence. Article 14 of the Lieber Code states, “Military necessity, as understood by modern civilized nations, consists in the necessity of those measures which are indispensable for securing the ends of the war, and which are lawful according to the modern law and usages of war,” i.e., military necessity permits only that degree of force necessary to defeat the enemy. Although some have pointed to military necessity as justification for the destruction of an enemy’s property, e.g. defendants in the Nuremberg trials following WWII, it does not justify the willful or wanton destruction, not justified by imperative military necessity.

The Brussels Declaration of 1874, as well as the Hague Regulations on the Laws and Customs of War on Land of 1899 and 1907 (Link to the 1899 and 1907 page), are partially based on the Lieber Code and retain the principle that cultural property should be protected in times of armed conflict.

Full text of the Lieber Code »
See in particular, Article II Sections 34-36 where the protection of cultural property is mandated.

Do Your Ears Hang Low?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Anna von Reitz <avannavon@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:59 PM
Subject: Do Your Ears Hang Low?

How many of you remember the children's song, "Do Your Ears Hang Low?"  --- Remember this line--- "Do your ears hang low?  Do they wobble to and fro?  Can you throw them over your shoulder like a Continental Soldier?....."

This song dates from Revolutionary War times.  Although it sounds silly and children still delight in it, the "ears" the rowdy Colonists were talking about weren't attached to their heads, and the song was regularly sung by those same Continental Soldiers on the march--- similar to the Marines singing "Sound Off!" as they march.

As the song makes very clear, there were soldiers called "Continental Soldiers" -- and it is also clear that they were the American soldiers fighting in the Revolutionary War.  What other "Continental Soldiers" have you ever heard of? 

They were called "Continental Soldiers" and sometimes just "Continentals" because they were landsmen not sailors, and they were protecting their land from British invasion.

Continental Soldier equals "Land Soldier" and Continental United States equals "Land United States".  It was the militias of the land that defeated the British sea-borne attackers. 

Please note these same soldiers were called "Colonial Soldiers" or just "Colonials".  This in turn references the fact that the Revolutionary War was supported by the 13 Colonies.

What do you know--- or should you know--- about the 13 Colonies? 

First, they were all very different, not just in location, but in derivation.  Some of the colonies were established by England--- New England and Virginia, for example--- and were funded in the early days by British investment companies: New England Company, Virginia Company, etc. 

Others were founded by other European Monarchies and their investment companies--- New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Maryland, for example, were not founded or financed by England.  

Catholic Delaware and Maryland stood cheek and jowl with Protestant Virginia Colony. 

This should give everyone a clue that when the American Colonies stood up together and acted as one accord as Americans, it was not as the popular historians would have you believe a matter of a united America standing against the British.  It was a matter of colonies of various European nations breaking away from the domination of Europe, and in the case of Maryland and Delaware-- breaking away from the control of the Pope. 

Nothing like it had ever been seen in the history of the world.  No colony had ever broken free of the grip of the sponsoring nation.  And here you had thirteen of them, all going for broke, and repudiating the claims of the assorted European Monarchies and the Pope, together, at once. 

As such, the American Revolution was a revolution of thought, a new idea, and that idea was that men have the right of freewill and self-determination given them by their Creator, and no man--- no Monarch, no Pope -- has the right to dictate another's conscience, lay claim to his body or his land or his assets, or otherwise inflict taxes and "injuries" or require payments for services rendered without his consent. 

It wasn't just the King of England being given a send up.  It was the King of France, the King of the Netherlands, the King of Denmark, the King of Spain-----all the European Monarchs and the Pope----being given their walking papers.

So now you have some key information that has been missing, perhaps, from your education on these subjects.  I had Michael R. Hamilton send me an email and accuse me of just making up the name "Continental United States" and "Continental Marshals".

Well, if I made it up, then I would own the copyright to it, correct?  And there would be no need for the flap over who "owns" or doesn't own the Continental Marshals service.

But, regrettably, I didn't think of it.  The Founders did. 

The need for the Continental Marshals arose soon after the adoption of the actual Constitution, and it arose as a result of splitting the international jurisdiction owed to the united Colonies acting as the united "States of America" into delegated and undelegated powers. 

In 1790, George Washington organized the first United States Districts and the first US Marshals service as a part of the fall-out of the federal Judiciary Act.  They were assigned to protect the newly mandated federal maritime and admiralty courts.  They served in the delegated international jurisdiction created by The Constitution. 

In the same year, Benjamin Franklin organized the Continental Marshals to operate within the already established Postal Districts, to protect the Post Offices and Post Roads. Over time, the Continental (Land) Marshals became known as Federal Marshals.  They served the states and the people to maintain and enforce the Public Law governing the undelegated portion of international jurisdiction that was retained by the states and the people.  (Amendment X of the Bill of Rights).

Easily within my lifetime and most of yours, you have heard of both "Federal Marshals" and "US Marshals" but probably never knew the difference. 

Confusion reigns because from the foundations of this country there have always been two (or more) entities calling themselves the "United States". 

To shed more light on this circumstance, I am here reprinting all of one of the immortal Howard Freeman's articles.

Please note that since Howard wrote this some time back in the 1990's or 2000's, the Uniform Commercial Code has been renumbered and the actual Code Section that allows you to retain your constitutional guarantees is no longer UCC 1-207, but is now instead UCC 1-308.  

Also note the confusion that arises at the end of the article when even Howard Freeman used "Federal" as a catch-all term instead of distinguishing between "US" (delegated) and "Federal" (non-delegated) powers. 

It was to avoid this confusion that I suggested resurrecting the original name "Continental Marshals" and using that instead of "Federal Marshals" so that people would more readily grasp the fact that the Continental Marshals work for the land jurisdiction states and the people and be able to set them apart from "United States Marshals" who work for the incorporated UNITED STATES, INC.

Thanks to both ignorance and guile in some quarters, the re-use of the name "Continental Marshals" was used to spawn a new and different confusion--- at least in the minds of some less informed people--- who have attempted to call state militiamen "continental marshals". 

It boils down to this, folks--- the states of the union have the iron-clad guarantee that they can keep their "well-regulated militias" and they need to make use of that guarantee by retaining that name for their state-based armed forces.  There is a fundamental guarantee lost by calling militiamen "marshals".

When we knowingly operate in the international jurisdiction of the sea, we have historical precedent going back to Ben Franklin for using officers called "Continental Marshals" and later "Federal Marshals" to enforce the undelegated international jurisdiction owed to the states and people.

If we want to retain our freedom and restore our lawful government instead of going off the tracks and engaging in an insurrectionist folly, it only makes sense to cut the confusion to the bone and call offices and officers by their historically correct names. 

As you read this article, "The Two United States and the Law" also bear in mind that since Freeman wrote this---and although what he says remains fundamentally true---another sleight of hand has taken place and the original "United States" he correctly refers to as the "continental United States" has dropped completely off the board (unless we resurrect it) and the "Two United States" currently being employed by the rats in Congress are the Territorial United States (what Freeman calls the "Federal United States") and the Municipal United States, so that we are denied access to any of the constitutional guarantees as long as we submit to being counted either "United States Citizens" or "citizens of the United States":

The Two United States and the Law
by Howard Freeman
 

Our forefathers, weary of the oppressive measures that King George III’s government forced upon them, in common declared their independence from England in 1776. They were not expected to be successful in that resistance. The moneyed people had backed England for two major reasons. First, our forefathers wanted a rigid, written Constitution “set in concrete.” They were familiar with the so-called Constitution of England which consisted largely of customs, precedents, traditions, and understandings, often vague and always flexible. They wanted the principle of English common law, that an act done by any official person or law-making body beyond his or its legal competence was simply void. Second, the thirteen little colonies desired to base their union on substance (gold and silver) — real money. They well knew how the despotic governments of Europe were mortgaged to the hilt — lock, stock, and barrel, the land, the people, everything — to certain wealthy men who controlled the banks, the currency, and all credit, who lent credit but did not loan gold and silver!

The United States of America was made up of a union of what is now fifty sovereign States, a three-branch (legislative, executive, and judicial) Republic known as The United States of America, or as termed in this article, the Continental United States. Its citizenry live in one of the fifty States, and its laws are based on the Constitution, which is based on Common Law.

Less than one hundred years after we became a nation, a loophole was discovered in the Constitution by cunning lawyers in league with the international bankers. They realized that a separate nation existed, by the same name, that Congress had created in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17. This “United States” is a Legislative Democracy within the Constitutional Republic, and is known as the Federal United States. It has exclusive, unlimited rule over its citizenry, the residents of the District of Columbia, the territories and enclaves (Guam, Midway Islands, Wake Island, Puerto Rico, etc.), and anyone who is a citizen by way of the 14th Amendment (naturalized citizens).

Both United States have the same Congress that rules in both nations. One “United States,” the Republic of fifty States, has the “stars and stripes” as its flag, but without any fringe on it. The Federal United States’ flag is the stars and stripes with a yellow fringe, seen in all the courts. The abbreviations of the States of the Continental United States are, with or without the zip codes, Ala., Alas., Ariz., Ark., Cal., etc. The abbreviations of the States under the jurisdiction of the Federal United States, the Legislative Democracy, are AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, etc. (without any periods).

Under the Constitution, based on Common Law, the Republic of the Continental United States provides for legal cases (1) at Law, (2) in Equity, and (3) in Admiralty:

(1) Law is the collective organization of the individual right to lawful defense. It is the will of the majority, the organization of the natural right of lawful defense. It is the substitution of a common force for individual forces, to do only what the individual forces have a natural and lawful right to do: to protect persons, liberties, and properties; to maintain the right of each, and to cause justice to reign over us all. Since an individual cannot lawfully use force against the person, liberty, or property of another individual, then the common force — for the same reason — cannot lawfully be used to destroy the person, liberty, or property of individuals or groups. Law allows you to do anything you want to, as long as you don’t infringe upon the life, liberty or property of anyone else. Law does not compel performance. Today’s so-called laws (ordinances, statutes, acts, regulations, orders, precepts, etc.) are often erroneously perceived as law, but just because something is called a “law” does not necessarily make it a law. [There is a difference between “legal” and “lawful.” Anything the government does is legal, but it may not be lawful.] 

(2) Equity is the jurisdiction of compelled performance (for any contract you are a party to) and is based on what is fair in a particular situation. The term “equity” denotes the spirit and habit of fairness, justness, and right dealing which would regulate the intercourse of men with men. You have no rights other than what is specified in your contract. Equity has no criminal aspects to it.

(3) Admiralty is compelled performance plus a criminal penalty, a civil contract with a criminal penalty.

By 1938 the gradual merger procedurally between law and equity actions (i.e., the same court has jurisdiction over legal, equitable, and admiralty matters) was recognized. The nation was bankrupt and was owned by its creditors (the international bankers) who now owned everything — the Congress, the Executive, the courts, all the States and their legislatures and executives, all the land, and all the people. Everything was mortgaged in the national debt. We had gone from being sovereigns over government to subjects under government, through the use of negotiable instruments to discharge our debts with limited liability, instead of paying our debts at common law with gold or silver coin.

The remainder of this article explains how this happened, where we are today, and what remedy we have to protect ourselves from this system.

Our Present Commercial System of “Law”
and the REMEDY Provided for Our Protection
The present commercial system of “law” has replaced the old and familiar Common Law upon which our nation was founded. The following is the legal thread which brought us from sovereigns over government to subjects under government, through the use of negotiable instruments (Federal Reserve Notes) to discharge our debts with limited liability instead of paying our debts at common law with gold or silver coin.

The change in our system of law from public law to private commercial law was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in the Erie Railroad v. Thompkins case of 1938, after which case, in the same year, the procedures of Law were officially blended with the procedures of Equity. Prior to 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions were based upon public law — or that system of law that was controlled by Constitutional limitation. Since 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions are based upon what is termed public policy.

Public policy concerns commercial transactions made under the Negotiable Instrument’s Law, which is a branch of the international Law Merchant. This has been codified into what is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code, which system of law was made uniform throughout the fifty States through the cunning of the Congress of the United States (which “United States” has its origin in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, as distinguished from the “United States,” which is the Union of the fifty States).

In offering grants of negotiable paper (Federal Reserve Notes) which the Congress gave to the fifty States of the Union for education, highways, health, and other purposes, Congress bound all the States of the Union into a commercial agreement with the Federal United States (as distinguished from the Continental United States). The fifty States accepted the “benefits” offered by the Federal United States as the consideration of a commercial agreement between the Federal United States and each of the corporate States. The corporate States were then obligated to obey the Congress of the Federal United States and also to assume their portion of the equitable debts of the Federal United States to the international banking houses, for the credit loaned. The credit which each State received, in the form of federal grants, was predicated upon equitable paper.

This system of negotiable paper binds all corporate entities of government together in a vast system of commercial agreements and is what has altered our court system from one under the Common Law to a Legislative Article I Court, or Tribunal, system of commercial law. Those persons brought before this court are held to the letter of every statute of government on the federal, state, county, or municipal levels unless they have exercised the REMEDY provided for them within that system of Commercial Law whereby, when forced to use a so-called “benefit” offered, or available, to them, from government, they may reserve their former right, under the Common Law guarantee of same, not to be bound by any contract, or commercial agreement, that they did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally.

This is exactly how the corporate entities of state, county, and municipal governments got entangled with the Legislative Democracy, created by Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, and called here The Federal United States, to distinguish it from the Continental United States, whose origin was in the Union of the Sovereign States.
The same national Congress rules the Continental United States pursuant to Constitutional limits upon its authority, while it enjoys exclusive rule, with no Constitutional limitations, as it legislates for the Federal United States.

With the above information, we may ask: “How did we, the free Preamble citizenry of the Sovereign States, lose our guaranteed unalienable rights and be forced into acceptance of the equitable debt obligations of the Federal United States, and also become subject to that entity of government, and divorced from our Sovereign States in the Republic, which we call here the Continental United States?” We do not reside, work, or have income from any territory subject to the direct jurisdiction of the Federal United States. These are questions that have troubled sincere, patriotic Americans for many years. Our lack of knowledge concerning the cunning of the legal profession is the cause of that divorce, but a knowledge of the truth concerning the legal thread, which caught us in its net, will restore our former status as a free Preamble citizen of the Republic. The answer follows:

Our national Congress works for two nations foreign to each other, and by legal cunning both are called The United States. One is the Union of Sovereign States, under the Constitution, termed in this article the Continental United States. The other is a Legislative Democracy which has its origin in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, here termed the Federal United States. Very few people, when they see some “law” passed by Congress, ask themselves, “Which nation was Congress working for when it passed this or that so-called law?” Or, few ask,
“Does this particular law apply to the Continental citizenry of the Republic, or does this particular law apply only to residents of the District of Columbia and other named enclaves, or territories, of the Democracy called the Federal United States?”


Since these questions are seldom asked by the uninformed citizenry of the Republic, it was an open invitation for “cunning” political leadership to seek more power and authority over the entire citizenry of the Republic through the medium of “legalese.” Congress deliberately failed in its duty to provide a medium of exchange for the citizenry of the Republic, in harmony with its Constitutional mandate. Instead, it created an abundance of commercial credit money for the Legislative Democracy, where it was not bound by Constitutional limitations. Then, after having created an emergency situation, and a tremendous depression in the Republic, Congress used its emergency authority to remove the remaining substance (gold and silver) from the medium of exchange belonging to the Republic, and made the negotiable instrument paper of the Legislative Democracy (Federal United States) a legal tender for Continental United States citizenry to use in the discharge of debts.

At the same time, Congress granted the entire citizenry of the two nations the “benefit” of limited liability in the discharge of all debts by telling the citizenry that the gold and silver coins of the Republic were out of date and cumbersome. The citizens were told that gold and silver (substance) was no longer needed to pay their debts, that they were now “privileged” to discharge debt with this more “convenient” currency, issued by the Federal United States. Consequently, everyone was forced to “go modern,” and to turn in their gold as a patriotic gesture. The entire news media complex went along with the scam and declared it to be a forward step for our democracy, no longer referring to America as a Republic.

From that time on, it was a falling light for the Republic of 1776, and a rising light for Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal Democracy, which overcame the depression, which was caused by a created shortage of real money. There was created an abundance of debt paper money, so-called, in the form of interest-bearing negotiable instrument paper called Federal Reserve Notes, and other forms of paperwork credit instruments.

Since all contracts since Roosevelt’s time have the colorable consideration of Federal Reserve Notes, instead of a genuine consideration of silver and gold coin, all contracts are colorable contracts, and not genuine contracts. [According to Black’s Law Dictionary (1990), colorable means “That which is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit, feigned, having the appearance of truth.”] 

Consequently, a new colorable jurisdiction, called a statutory jurisdiction, had to be created to enforce the contracts. Soon the term colorable contract was changed to the term commercial agreement to fit circumstances of the new statutory jurisdiction, which is legislative, rather than judicial, in nature. This jurisdiction enforces commercial agreements upon implied consent, rather than full knowledge, as it is with the enforcement of contracts under the Common Law.

All of our courts today sit as legislative Tribunals, and the so-called “statutes” of legislative bodies being enforced in these Legislative Tribunals are not “statutes” passed by the legislative branch of our three-branch Republic, but as “commercial obligations” to the Federal United States for anyone in the Federal United States or in the Continental United States who has used the equitable currency of the Federal United States and who has accepted the “benefit,” or “privilege,” of discharging his debts with the limited liability “benefit” offered to him by the Federal United States … EXCEPT those who availed themselves of the remedy within this commercial system of law, which remedy is today found in Book 1 of the Uniform Commercial Code at Section 207.

When used in conjunction with one’s signature, a stamp stating “Without Prejudice U.C.C. 1-207” is sufficient to indicate to the magistrate of any of our present Legislative Tribunals (called “courts”) that the signer of the document has reserved his Common Law right. He is not to be bound to the statute, or commercial obligation, of any commercial agreement that he did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally, as would be the case in any Common Law contract.
Furthermore, pursuant to U.C.C. 1-103, the statute, being enforced as a commercial obligation of a commercial agreement, must now be construed in harmony with the old Common Law of America, where the tribunal/court must rule that the statute does not apply to the individual who is wise enough and informed enough to exercise the remedy provided in this new system of law. He retains his former status in the Republic and fully enjoys his unalienable rights, guaranteed to him by the Constitution of the Republic, while those about him “curse the darkness” of Commercial Law government, lacking the truth needed to free themselves from a slave status under the Federal United States, even while inhabiting territory foreign to its territorial venue.

PS--- if you want to send this to you mailing lists, best convert all the hyperlinks in the Freeman article to plain text.  Some servers are rejecting articles with embedded hyperlinks.